Is D&D Next Having an Identity Crisis?

To say that the past few days in the D&D universe have been interesting would be a bit of an understatement.

First of all, Monte Cook is off the D&D Next team. That’s bad. Just a few hours later, the public playtest date of May 24 was announced. That’s good… isn’t it? Then, leaks at Barnes & Noble revealed reprints of the 3.5 PHB and DMG, with errata, coming in September. Also released that same day is another product, with the obvious placeholder name “Provolone”. The cherry on top of the sundae is Amazon’s listing for a reprint of the classic Dungeon! boardgame. (It might or might not be a fake.)

What is up with all this?

I am most curious about Monte Cook’s departure. While he isn’t specific about his reasoning, he indicates that he left voluntarily due to differences with the company, but not his fellow designers. Couple this with the rumors of reprints, and you have to wonder if there is a significant push to get product on the shelves at any cost. Perhaps Monte thinks the game needs more time to develop than the business-side folks do, or something of that nature. That sort of thing happens more often that not, it seems.

Regarding the playtest date, D&D Next was said to be only partially complete a few weeks ago. Now, in less than a month, it’s ready for a public playtest? That’s concerning to me. From all accounts, the version of D&D Next played at DDXP was fairly complete, and it could be that the public playtest will use the same material. That would be acceptable, as there are so many of us who want to get our hands on it. If it’s not different, though, I won’t be able to shake the feeling that the open playtest is more damage control after Monte’s exit than anything else.

And what about those 3.5 rulebooks? Could “Provolone” be the missing third of the core books, the Monster Manual? Obviously, there are many fans of 3.5, but reprinting revised (with errata) versions of these books while woefully out of date versions of the 4e core books are still on shelves seems counterproductive. And why offer these at Barnes & Noble? I would think that reprints of books almost a decade old (niche products by almost any definition) would be better off as hobby store exclusives, similar to the 1e reprints coming this summer.

The Greyhawk Grognard is speculating that “Provolone” is really D&D Next, and that the 3.5 reprints are just placeholders for the Next versions of the books. While it seems shocking and outrageous on the surface, maybe there’s something to it. It would certainly explain Monte’s departure, a quicker timetable for playtesting, and the outright bizarre notion of selling 3.5 products at a mega-bookstore.

It might also explain the lack of releases later on in the year. Right now, the only product announced after August is the version-neutral Elminster’s Forgotten Realms supplement. Everything between now and then is similarly edition-less, including a Dungeon Tiles set and the Menzoberranzan campaign book, (as confirmed here). If D&D Next is indeed coming this fall, it might explain the empty spaces on the release calendar.

Speculation aside, there’s a lot to think about, and it’s clear that Wizards is shifting gears at the moment. I am a bit disheartened by all the tumult, and will probably remain cautious in my optimism about D&D Next until more information becomes available. Wizards really should be as transparent as possible here, and I suspect we will hear some official stances on these things very soon. In any event, I, like many of you, will be watching developments very closely.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in D&D, Dungeons & Dragons. Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Is D&D Next Having an Identity Crisis?

  1. alphastream says:

    Any new edition is a time when an RPG company _should_ shift gears. But, the rest of this is speculation based on things we do not understand and which may not be true. At the very least, they are unlikely to be random and are part of an actual product strategy. How it all fits together will, I’m sure, be shown in time. Again, assuming any of this is true.

    • Learning DM says:

      You are correct in saying that this time in between editions is a good time to shift gears. I am more concerned with what seemed to be a “slow simmer, let’s let it cook until we get it right” mentality shifting to a “must print stuff now” paradigm. Thus far in D&D Next development, it seemed to be laid back, but it doesn’t look that way today, again, assuming these rumors are true. I don’t want a poorly developed next edition, though, and that is why I am concerned.

  2. A new edition in such a rushed schedule? If so, it is already heading towards failure. I’ve been reluctant to buy the 5e candy from the very beginning, and now seems like a good moment for Wizards to call it off and focus on more quality material for 4e.

  3. I tend to agree with Alphastream on this one. I’m sure the folks at WOC, overall, have a general sense of what they are doing, and as time goes on they will narrow their focus down more and more to tackle specific issues that need to be addressed before the release. Anyway, on a related note, I recently posted an article titled “Game Designers Seek the Impossible for D&D Next” on my site that is somewhat related to this subject (http://houserules4dnd.weebly.com ). I’d like to invite you and your readers to take a look at it and make your opinions heard.

    And be sure to keep putting out more (many more) blog posts; I enjoy reading them!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s